Skip to main content
Featured AnalysisPrimary topicBitcoin

Bithumb Glitch Mistakenly Credits Users With 2,000 BTC, Triggers Flash Crash

An internal payout error on Feb. 6 briefly created large phantom Bitcoin balances and led to concentrated selling and a sharp, short-lived price drop on South Korea’s Bithumb exchange.

Feb 6, 20264:57 PMNewsroom AI

South Korea’s Bithumb confirmed an internal error on February 6 that mistakenly credited hundreds of users with 2,000 Bitcoin each during a promotional payout; staff had intended to distribute 2,000 Korean won (about $1.50) but selected BTC instead, according to the exchange’s notice and subsequent reporting [1][6][3].

The erroneous balances prompted concentrated selling that drove Bitcoin sharply lower on Bithumb within minutes — one report put the drop at roughly 16% on the platform — while other outlets recorded a roughly 10% decline and a local low near $55,000 as users and traders reacted to the phantom credits [1][2][6]. Some coverage estimated the mistaken credits were worth roughly $133 million at the impacted prices [5], and analysts described the event as a contained flash crash tied to forced or rapid selling of the credited balances [4].

Coverage noted the incident highlighted the need for stronger error‑checking and risk controls at exchanges; Bithumb’s public notices and industry reporting show the exchange moved to address the mistake while the episode drew regulatory and media attention [1][2][5][6].

The event underscored operational risk in centralized crypto platforms and prompted renewed scrutiny of exchange payout controls and safeguards [2][4][5].

Was this useful?

Anonymous signal used only for weekly cluster rankings. No public counters.

Share

Broadcast this coverage

Copy-ready links for the networks your audience checks first.

Support independent reporting

If this summary helped, a small tip helps keep ClusterWire running.

Privacy note: we log tip UI events (page + action, and article slug when applicable) to improve the feature. We don’t store IP address, user-agent, or wallet addresses in analytics. Tips are on-chain, so the sending address is public in the transaction.

Source Ledger

Citations

Follow the primary reporting behind this analysis. Click a citation to open the referenced source in a new tab.

Themes

Themes driving this story

Curated from the cluster of sources powering this article.

BitcoinThemeExchanges/CustodyThemeRegulation/PolicyThemeMacroeconomy/MarketsThemeEthereumTheme
Live Wire

Latest Coverage

Real-time crypto intelligence ordered by publication time.