Featured Story

Lessons Learned: How a Solana Wallet Ownership Scam Drained My Tokens and Bricked My Wallet Forever

🚨 TL;DR Summary

A Solana user signed a fraudulent transaction that secretly included two malicious instructions:

  1. Token drains that moved all SPL assets (including sentimental tokens like KENDU) to a scammer, and
  2. An ā€œAssignā€ instruction that changed the owner of the user’s main wallet account from the System Program to a malicious program.

This bricked the wallet permanently. Lost assets fall into two categories:

  1. SPL tokens → stolen
  2. Staked SOL → frozen forever (unrecoverable, because the bricked wallet can’t authorize withdrawals)

This is one of the most dangerous Solana-specific scams — and it does not exist on Ethereum. Here’s what happened and how to avoid it.

Nov 28, 202512:14 PMC.S. Myr

In late 2025, I encountered one of the most devastating Solana scams — an attack that drained every token from my wallet and permanently destroyed the wallet itself, even though I never revealed my seed phrase or approved any token spending.

This was not the usual ā€œapprove to spendā€ exploit seen on Ethereum. This was a uniquely Solana-specific attack: a wallet ownership hijack, combined with token-transfer instructions hidden in the same transaction.

This article explains what happened, why it’s possible, how it differs from other chains, and how to make sure it never happens to you.

šŸ” What Actually Happened

I interacted with what looked like a harmless Solana dApp. It asked me to sign a transaction. Nothing in the UI hinted at danger.

But hidden inside that transaction were two catastrophic instructions:

  1. Token drains (real theft) The scammer slipped in SPL token transfers that immediately moved all my tokens — including the ones I cared about most, like my $KENDU tokens — to the attacker’s wallet.

  2. Wallet ownership reassignment (wallet destruction) Another instruction changed the owner of my main wallet account from the System Program to a malicious program controlled by the attacker.

This is the nuclear option on Solana. Once the owner changes, your wallet is no longer a wallet:

  • It cannot sign
  • It cannot pay fees
  • It cannot authorize stake withdrawals
  • It cannot transfer assets
  • It cannot be recovered, even if you have the seed phrase

The private key becomes cryptographically valid but functionally useless.

šŸŽÆ Immediate Consequences

🟄 All my SPL tokens were stolen

Everything was transferred out:

  • memecoins
  • NFTs
  • small airdrops
  • collection items
  • and yes… my $KENDU tokens, which stung the most

This was straightforward theft.

🟧 My staked SOL was not stolen — but became unrecoverable

The attacker did NOT have the withdraw authority for my Marinade stake account —but I can’t withdraw it either, because:

  • my wallet can no longer sign
  • and can no longer pay fees
  • and cannot authorize changes

So the stake remains on-chain, untouched, but permanently frozen.

This is one of the rare cases where money isn’t stolen… but still gone.

🟄 My wallet itself was permanently bricked

The malicious ā€œAssignā€ instruction turned my wallet into a program-owned, non-signing account.

Phantom still shows it, but as far as the Solana runtime is concerned:

  • it is no longer a System Program wallet
  • it can no longer act as a signer
  • it is no longer a fee payer
  • it is no longer a valid authority for anything

This is irreversible.

🧠 Why This Can Happen on Solana (But Not on Ethereum)

To understand how this is possible, it’s important to understand Solana’s architecture.

Solana accounts are general-purpose

Every account on Solana — wallets, metadata, NFTs, PDAs, program state — shares the same structure:

  • some lamports
  • some data
  • an owner program (the program allowed to modify it)

A normal wallet is simply:

Owner = System Program (11111111111111111111111111111111)

But if you sign a transaction that changes that owner field… your wallet ceases to behave like a wallet.

This design gives Solana its flexibility and speed, because it treats all accounts the same.

But it also creates a footgun: signing an owner change on your primary wallet is fatal.

šŸ”’ Why This Cannot Happen on Ethereum

Ethereum wallets (EOAs):

  • always remain controlled by a private key
  • cannot be reassigned
  • cannot be bricked via contract calls
  • maintain signing capability as long as you hold the key

This attack fundamentally does not exist on EVM chains.

Solana’s powerful account model enables incredible performance, but comes with pitfalls that Ethereum users are not accustomed to thinking about.

šŸ›”ļø How to Avoid This Scam

1ļøāƒ£ Never sign a transaction that modifies account ownership

If Phantom warns that a signature ā€œchanges ownerā€ or ā€œmodifies account permissions,ā€ reject it immediately. Legitimate dApps do not need this for your main wallet.

2ļøāƒ£ Always use burner wallets for unknown dApps

The safest way to explore Solana is with disposable addresses.

3ļøāƒ£ Understand that Solana signatures are powerful

Unlike Ethereum approvals, a Solana transaction can:

  • change authorities
  • reassign ownership
  • lock accounts
  • drain balances
  • modify program state

If the instruction list looks odd or unfamiliar — cancel.

4ļøāƒ£ Use a hardware wallet for meaningful funds

Hardware devices show raw instruction details, making it easier to notice suspicious behavior.

šŸ’¬ Final Thoughts: The Painful Lesson

This wasn’t just a financial loss. I lost:

  • every SPL token I had
  • sentimental collectibles like my $KENDU tokens
  • my entire wallet identity
  • access to my staked SOL
  • the history tied to that address

— all because of one malicious transaction with a hidden ā€œAssign ownerā€ instruction.

Solana’s power makes it an incredible platform, but also opens new types of attacks that most people have never heard of.

If this article prevents even one person from repeating my mistake, then sharing this story is worth it.

Stay safe out there — and always double-check what you sign. šŸ’œāš”

Was this useful?

Anonymous signal used only for weekly cluster rankings. No public counters.

Share

Broadcast this coverage

Copy-ready links for the networks your audience checks first.

Support independent reporting

If you find this story valuable, a small tip helps keep ClusterWire running.

Privacy note: we log tip UI events (page + action, and article slug when applicable) to improve the feature. We don’t store IP address, user-agent, or wallet addresses in analytics. Tips are on-chain, so the sending address is public in the transaction.

Live Wire

Latest Coverage

Real-time crypto intelligence ordered by publication time.

23m ago

South Dakota Representative Introduces Bill to Let State Invest Up to 10% of Public Funds in Bitcoin

House Bill 1155, introduced by Republican Rep. Logan Manhart, would allow a portion of South Dakota’s public funds to be allocated to Bitcoin and outlines custody and approval r…

Read more
2h ago

Gemini to shut down Nifty Gateway NFT marketplace in February

Nifty Gateway has entered withdrawal-only mode as Gemini prepares to close the marketplace, raising concerns about the accessibility of some NFTs.

Read more
5h ago

U.S. Authorities Probe Alleged Theft of Over $40M in Seized Cryptocurrency

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT identified transfers from wallets tied to U.S. government seizures; Trump adviser Patrick Witt and the U.S. Marshals Service are leading an offic…

Read more
6h ago

Japan’s FSA opens consultation on bonds eligible for yen stablecoin reserves

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has opened a public consultation on draft rules that define which bonds may be used to back yen‑pegged stablecoins issued through trust s…

Read more
7h ago

Bitcoin Confirms Bearish Structure After $98,000 Rejection

A neckline rejection near $98,000 has reinforced a bearish bias as prices trade below $90,000 and macro flows favor gold over BTC [1][2].

Read more
8h ago

Mesh Raises $75M Series C, Reaches $1 Billion Valuation

Crypto payments network Mesh secures $75 million in Series C funding, pushing total capital raised past $200 million as it scales its global payments infrastructure.

Read more