BIS says stablecoins lack payment credibility at scale; tokenised bank deposits favored for routine use
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said stablecoins lack credibility for payments at scale, according to BIS chief Pablo Hernández de Cos [1] [2].
BIS chief Pablo Hernández de Cos, speaking at the Jackson Hole symposium, said tokenised bank deposits are a stronger option than stablecoins for daily use [2] [1].
BIS reportedly drew a line between stablecoins and tokenised commercial-bank deposits, suggesting the latter are better positioned to carry routine transactions if financial activity moves onto programmable networks [3].
Additional reporting reiterated that BIS considers stablecoins still not credible money at scale and highlighted tokenised deposits as the alternative discussed by Hernández de Cos [4].
Anonymous feedback used to improve internal story ranking. No public totals are shown.
Share
Share this article
Share this article on social platforms.
Support ClusterWire
If you find ClusterWire useful, tips help cover hosting and infrastructure costs.
We record anonymous interactions with tip buttons to understand feature usage. We do not include IP addresses, user-agent strings, or wallet addresses in these tip analytics. Blockchain transactions are public and may reveal the sending address.
Sources
Review the sources used to produce this brief. Citations open the referenced material in a new tab.
- 1Stablecoins fail payment credibility test, BIS sayscrypto.news• Aug 30, 2026
- 2The Central Banks' Bank Backs Tokenised Deposits Over StablecoinsCoinpaprika News• Aug 30, 2026
- 3BIS Draws a Line Between Stablecoins and Tokenized Bank DepositsBTCUSA• Aug 30, 2026
- 4BIS Chief: Stablecoins Still Aren’t Credible Money at ScaleBitcoin.com News• Aug 30, 2026
Updates and corrections
No changes recorded in the new revision log. Earlier edits may not be included.
Topics
Related Topics
Topics identified from the sources associated with this article.